Painful Truth: Social media a miserable experience in the professional trenches

The weird incentives that mean Facebook doesn’t care about its own users.

It’s a rare day now that some social media firm doesn’t enrage its users.

Tumblr caused a furor by banning all adult content, after years of hosting it without a peep. Twitter is at the centre of a permanent rage-storm caused by its failure to deal with white supremacists and harassment. YouTube just saw the collapse of a major “network” that represented dozens of video creators, leaving them without payment for their recent work. Facebook saw the release of documents that did not put its senior management and privacy policies in a good light, to say the least.

Very few businesses could get away with serving their users and creatives as poorly as social media giants do.

Why do they do it, then?

Because social media is unlike any other media. They only have one customer, and it’s not your or me, it’s not their most famous online celebrities. It’s just the advertisers. That’s it.

Old media typically had at least two audiences. Yes, TV and newspapers and magazines are driven by advertising revenue. But they also sell subscriptions or have to keep up ratings. If you offend too many people or publish false reporting, there tend to be repercussions, whether it’s cancelled subscriptions, libel lawsuits, or a mob with torches and pitchforks outside the office.

With social media, you are the audience and the broadcaster. And no one is. There is just the algorithm, and the algorithm grabs whatever it can out of the content pile and shoves it in front of people. If it holds onto their eyeballs, the algorithm deems it good, and it shall be successful. If not, well, there’ll be more content along any microsecond for the algorithm to process.

This has created a profound disincentive for Facebook and YouTube to engage with their creators beyond the bare minimum necessary.

For instance, as someone who uses Facebook professionally, I can tell you the site is a pain to deal with. It is awkward and subject to constant minor changes to functionality. Some functions are awkward or even grindingly slow. There are surprisingly frequent bugs and outages that prevent us from posting for a few hours.

How is this the product of a cutting edge, multi-billion-dollar-valued company? Why don’t they care that, as a frequent user and poster of their vaunted content, I’m having a cruddy time there?

Because we’re not a client of Facebook. We’re just a user, and Facebook treats us no differently than your cousin Charlene posting her baby pictures or a pet store posting a coupon offer for dog chews. Attention is rewarded, disinterest is punished. The bare minimum of functionality is sufficient.

I’ve seen similar complaints leveled against YouTube and other major sharing websites. Easy enough to share as a single person, but people trying to use them professionally tend to have a long list of complaints.

What would turn things around?

If Facebook started asking media companies who use it to pay for the privilege, I think that would help.

Really. If newspapers and TV stations and so forth became clients of social media sites, we might actually get some pull. If there was money on the line, the social media giants might have to actually consider what we want, not just what the algorithm wants.

But I doubt it will ever happen. Because the business model doesn’t work that way. They literally can’t afford to let us pay them.

If they did that, they’d have to admit that some users are actually clients. And that would mean that some types of content are more valuable than others.

It would mean Facebook and YouTube and Instagram and Twitter might have to take some small level of responsibility for what they published. And that would be a bridge too far.

Just Posted

Langley photographer captures otters amid the ice

While photographing winter on the river, a local photographer was there when otters caught a fish.

Why some Langley sidewalks don’t get shovelled

All walkways are not equal under rules that give priority to higher-traffic areas

How much does your city spend per person on snow removal?

Black Press Media compares 2018 ice and snow removal budgets of various Lower Mainland communities

Stock trading allegations dismissed against former Langley spiritual leader

Investors allegedly lost $740,000 investing through a local religious organization.

B.C. BUDGET: Surplus $374 million after bailouts of BC Hydro, ICBC

Growth projected stronger in 2020, Finance Minister Carole James says

VIDEO: 8 things you need to know about the 2019 B.C. budget

Surplus of $247 million with spending on children, affordability and infrastructure

‘Bullet missed me by an inch’: Man recounts friend’s killing at Kamloops hotel

Penticton man witnessed Summerland resident Rex Gill’s murder in Kamloops

B.C. BUDGET: Income assistance raise still leaves many below poverty line

$50 per month increase included in funding for poverty and homelessness reduction

B.C. BUDGET: Indigenous communities promised billions from gambling

Extended family caregiver pay up 75 per cent to keep kids with relatives

B.C. BUDGET: New benefit increases family tax credits up to 96 per cent

BC Child Opportunity Benefit part of province’s efforts to reduce child poverty

B.C. BUDGET: Carbon tax boosts low-income credits, electric vehicle subsidies

Homeowners can get up to $14,000 for heating, insulation upgrades

B.C. man survives heart attack thanks to Facebook

A Princeton man suffered a heart attack while at an isolated property with no cell service

Abbotsford man sues Maxime Bernier’s People’s Party over trademark

Satinder Dhillon filed application for trademark same day Maxime Bernier announced the new party

New trial ordered over banning whales, dolphins at Vancouver aquarium

Park board’s appeal reverses previous decision that found it had no right to implement a ban

Most Read