I am dumbstruck by your article [Lawyers vote on law school proposal, Oct. 2, Langley Advance].
All of this is because of their perceived notion that TWU is discriminating in contrast to Canadian law.
So let me understand these lawyersâ€™ thinking: â€œWe will discriminate against them, if they discriminate.â€
Arenâ€™t lawyers supposed to protect people against discrimination? Wouldnâ€™t that be the same as a lawyer saying, if you kill then I will kill you?
Anyway, if B.C. lawyers vote to discriminate against TWU because (in their opinion) TWU discriminates, then I (as a business owner) can discriminate against lawyers for discriminating.
Can you see where this is going?
If lawyers will push this discrimination through against TWU, I will probably have signs outside my businesses stating that no B.C. lawyers are permitted on my premises.
Jack Poolman, Langley