Letter: Coulter Berry saga misunderstood

Dear Editor,

Your latest coverage on the Coulter Berry saga [Three nights of furor over Fort site, March 13, Langley Advance] was disappointing in its lack of any insight into the more profound issues underlying the community dispute.

The underlying issues are not the format or appearance of the building or the speculated benefits (or otherwise) to Fort Langley. Everyone is entitled to their opinion on those.

The real issue is the proposed amendment and change to the Official Community Plan and Heritage Guidelines, and why those amendments should be considered by council.

Despite the mayor’s exhortation to speakers at the public hearing to focus on the agenda topic, “should the OCP and HG be amended to permit this development,” most of the supporters of the project chose to reiterate what would be built and who would build it.

The message was similar: the building was unique, LEED certified, attractive, and so on.

These may well be so, but are of little value in explaining exactly why the existing restrictions and guidelines should be amended. I have yet to hear a coherent argument as to why, other than the obvious one: that it serves the need of the developer.

That’s not an adequate answer, and council cannot be fooled into thinking it is.

It’s a circular argument, and reminiscent of the Monty Python “I have a theory, which is mine and belongs to me” skit:

“I’d like you to relax the restrictions so I can build my building.”

“Yes, but why do you want us to relax the restrictions?”

“So I can build my building.”

“Yes, but why do you want us to relax the restrictions?”

“So I can build my building, it’s a very nice building.”

“ Yes, but why…” etc.

(repeat, ad nauseum)

Absent an answer to the question of why, the only rational conclusion one can draw is that there is no defensible reason to amend the OCP and HG.

Dr. Alister Frayne, Langley

Just Posted

South Langley centre offers seniors an array of activities

Members decide which courses and activities are offered at the Brookswood Seniors Centre.

Throwback Thursday: Jan. 17, 2019

Help us caption a photo from Langley’s past.

LETTER: Langley/Surrey shortchanged on transit for Vancouver

Funding to get SkyTrain to Langley City could come from not undergrounding Vancouver’s extension.

LETTER: Area letter writer puts Trump government shutdown in perspective

A Maple Ridge letter writer is critical of Hillary Clinton’s comments about the shutdown.

LETTER: Langley man believes immigrants get too many taxpayer resources

A letter writer says seniors, veterans and others deserve funds before newcomers.

Rare ‘super blood wolf moon’ takes to the skies this Sunday

Celestial event happens only three times this century

Missing man from Crowsnest Pass could be in Lower Mainland

58-year-old Stuart David Duff was last seen on Jan. 6, 2019.

Scientists ID another possible threat to orcas: pink salmon

For two decades, significantly more of the whales have died in even-numbered years than in odd years

B.C. dangerous offender in court for violating no-contact order, sends letter to victim

Wayne Belleville was shocked to see a letter addressed to him from his shooter, Ronald Teneycke

Judge denies requests from Calgary couple charged in son’s death

David and Collet Stephan wanted $4 million to pay for past and future legal bills

Explosion sends B.C. firefighter to hospital

Kelowna fire crews responded to a blaze at Pope’sGallery of BC Art & Photography on Friday

Ex-Mountie investigating ‘Surrey six’ murders pleads guilty to obstruction

Derek Brassington entered his plea in B.C. Supreme Court on Friday

Man blames his loud car radio, sirens for crash with B.C. ambulance

Tribunal rejects bid to recoup ICBC costs after crash deemed 100-per-cent his fault

RECALL: Salmon Village maple salmon nuggets

Customers warned not to eat product due to possible Listeria contamination

Most Read