It is with great disappointment that I write this letter. Council has once again ignored a community plan and barreled ahead with its own agenda, despite community opposition.
What is the point of a community plan if we do not to follow it? What is the point of a Public Hearing if council does not listen?
Collectively, the residents of Langley Township own a piece of property in Aldergrove through which Bertrand Creek runs. The property is divided; its northern portion contains degraded land and its southern half is forested.
The forest is far superior to what the development company would have us believe. What matters though, and what really needs to be made clear to everyone in Aldergrove, is that a sixth of the land was designated Educational/Recreational. According to the Official Aldergrove Community Plan, it was not intended for development, yet it is now included in their development plans.
The Township commissioned a developer, and has likely been working on plans for over a year (a conclusion derived from the fact that the arborist report is from a year ago), then posted development signs during the busiest time of year: Christmas and New Yearâ€™s.
Residents had only three weeksâ€™ notice of the Townshipâ€™s intention to alter the OCP and re-zone the property before the public hearing.
Many individuals signed a hastily organized petition, and many, many people did attend the public hearing to register opposition to the OCP amendment. But alas, our voices fell on deaf ears.
The land is Aldergroveâ€™s only opportunity to have easy access to a local environmental area within walking distance from our homes and schools. It was intended for everyone to enjoy, but council has now essentially taken a park from us.
A development will sit in the middle of this land, and although Township planners advise 7.7 acres will remain forested, as generous as it may sound, they are merely following the minimum guidelines put in place to protect streams, tributaries, and swamps.
In the end, it may be even less, as the owner of an adjacent 50-acre property is hoping to develop and connect with a road, taking up even more of the forest and green space that was intended for our recreational use.
Of course Township does not want you to know all of this. They donâ€™t tell you that the drainage of the property will be altered or that a substantial amount of fill will be required to ready this property for development. A pond, albeit a former slough, will be filled and built on. They neglect telling us that many of these â€˜inferiorâ€™ trees they are cutting down are indeed Alder trees, the trees that gave â€œAldergroveâ€ its name.
Iâ€™m sure the animals in the forest are not aware that their habitat includes these inferior trees. What matters to them is that they have a habitat.
Smaller, albeit superior trees, wonâ€™t cut it. And for the Aldergrove resident looking for a place to enjoy nature on land that was set aside for them to enjoy â€“ it will be gone.
As for the comments from our council, I cringe. O
ne councilor called the forest a â€œwar zone,â€ possibly a reference to some of the social problems Aldergrove faces â€“ a separate issue that cannot be solved by developing a forest, an area meant and designated for recreation, a place for our students to explore and learn.
Letâ€™s not punish the majority for the follies of a few.
And the biggest disappointment of all? Once again the controversial pool/ice arena has been brought into the conversation. They say this land is being sold to support the building of the pool.
Have they not learned from the Glen Valley experience? Aldergrove residents do not want to be pitted against each other. I support the effort to afford a pool for Aldergrove, but please do not do it by selling a precious urban forest that was intended for a different form of recreation.
My hope is that Aldergrove residents will speak up and not give up. This land was intended for our use in some sort of recreational or educational capacity. Petition council to not sell the forest.
Jessica Horst, Aldergrove